Efforts to address corruption within the Lagos State Land Bureau continue to face significant challenges, as systemic issues and the actions of key individuals undermine reform initiatives.
Allegations of fraudulent activities, abuse of office, and confrontation with state authorities have cast a shadow on the bureau’s operations, with repercussions for the government and innocent land allottees.
During the administration of Governor Akinwunmi Ambode, the Land Bureau underwent sweeping reforms aimed at curbing corruption.
Over 78 Certificates of Occupancy (C of O) and consents were cancelled, leading to the dismissal of several officials.
Ambode directed the digitalisation of land documentation, introducing digital Certificates of Occupancy and warehousing yellow paper certificates at MTN House to prevent misuse.
Despite these efforts, numerous consents were fraudulently registered without supporting files, enabling corrupt practices to persist.
A recent case illustrates the complexities of land disputes and alleged misconduct within the bureau.
Plot 1, Block 4, Lekki Peninsula Residential Scheme 1, originally allocated to Mr. Adetunji Ola, became the centre of controversy after being mortgaged to Starmark Finance Company Ltd.
Following a period of inactivity on the land, suspicious activity prompted Starmark to petition the Special Operations Governor’s Office for intervention. Investigations revealed multiple claims of ownership, some involving forged documentation.
A lawyer, Demola Ekundayo Esq, representing a rival claimant, allegedly defied police instructions and court orders, escalating tensions.
The Federal Criminal Intelligence and Investigation Department (FCIID) in Abuja completed a comprehensive investigation, issuing legal advice.
However, a senior police officer, identified as Mrs. Mariam, reportedly interfered, favouring one party despite existing evidence.
Her actions, which included deploying armed police officers to the land and arresting labourers, have drawn accusations of bias and abuse of office.
Mrs. Mariam is alleged to have acted against established police protocols, which require state government clearance before investigating disputes over state land.
Her conduct has raised concerns about a potential conflict between police authorities and Lagos State’s land management efforts. Critics suggest she has personal interests in the case, claiming she received substantial financial inducements.
The misuse of authority by key figures, including police officers and judicial officials, brings to the fore the systemic flaws in the fight against land grabbing and fraud.
Stakeholders argue for heightened sensitisation of the judiciary, law enforcement, and the public to address the underlying issues effectively.
The Lagos State Government’s mechanisms to combat land theft face resistance from entrenched interests, jeopardising its efforts to safeguard its internal revenue and public trust.
Without decisive action, corruption within the Land Bureau and related entities may continue to erode confidence in the state’s governance and judicial systems.
